🧪 [testing improvement] Fix and enhance HashMap resize test coverage#38
🧪 [testing improvement] Fix and enhance HashMap resize test coverage#38
Conversation
Co-authored-by: ulac000000 <132948319+ulac000000@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: The testing gap addressed: Missing Test for HashMap Resize Logic and a dangling pointer issue in an existing test.
📊 Coverage: What scenarios are now tested: A specific test exact resize boundary at 75% load factor ensures accurate transition from 8 to 16 capacity on insertion of the 7th item. The stress test was updated to test dynamically allocated memory and properly trigger thousands of resizes to catch collisions properly.
✨ Result: The improvement in test coverage: Resize exact limits are strictly confirmed to have proper capacity tracking and element survival logic.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 5649406687465840401 started by @ulac000000