Skip to content

update for #576#581

Open
davidcarlisle wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
gh576
Open

update for #576#581
davidcarlisle wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
gh576

Conversation

@davidcarlisle
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This implements in full (I hope) the suggestions from #576

Comment thread src/conformance.html Outdated
Comment thread src/conformance.html
and so the <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/mathml-core/#security-considerations">Security Considerations</a> specified there apply.</p>
and so the <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/mathml-core/#security-considerations">Security Considerations</a> specified there apply in addition to the
considerations listed below.</p>
<p>In some situations, MathML expressions can be parsed as XML. The security considerations of XML parsing apply then as explained in [[?RFC7303]].</p>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is [[?RFC7303]] correct or is the "?" someone guessing as to the reference? It references XML Media Types, which seems wrong.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's respec markup I forget exactly what the ? does but we use it quite a few times throughout the spec It affects the form of the generated bibliography. That part was in the existing document not added by this PR @NSoiffer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think the reference to media types is correct (in regards to XML parsing security considerations)?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@davidcarlisle davidcarlisle May 31, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@NSoiffer It was suggested by @polx 3c8363f so been there since 2022

@NSoiffer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think we also were going to do a small update to the intent section. Should that be a separate PR?

@davidcarlisle
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I think we also were going to do a small update to the intent section. Should that be a separate PR?

@NSoiffer er.. I forget, do you want to make a PR? It's probably easier than reminding me what I was supposed to add.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants