docs(2-bm): home the energy-cal rotary-stage conflict in STAGE-5 (ENERGY-7 cross-link)#303
Merged
Conversation
…RGY-7 cross-link) The ENERGY-7 answer (#256) named the channel-cut crystal's rocking stage as an ABRS-150MP, which conflicts with the installed sample rotary: a serial-numbered ABRS-250MP-M-AS (S/N 146853-A-1-1-X, confirmed in STAGE-3 / #164). That is not an energy-calibration detail, it is evidence bearing on STAGE-5, the open rotary-kit-swap question (250MP installed vs the 150MP / spindle swap-kit alternatives, item_050). So this folds the stage-model conflict into STAGE-5 (where the rotary identity / kit-swap question lives) rather than leaving it as a disconnected ENERGY-7 residual: either the 150MP is genuinely mounted for energy calibration (a real kit swap) or it is a slip for the installed 250MP. ENERGY-7 is slimmed to its crystal-only residuals (explicit Si(220) and re-run cadence). Why not just adopt the 150MP: the installed rotary's identity is anchored to a serial number + drawing + an explicit staff "it is a 250MP (corrects the ABS typo)" in STAGE-3; you do not repaint a serial-numbered asset's model on a one-line side-mention, especially given this stage's documented typo history. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Coverage report
This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to the ENERGY-7 fold (#300), reconciling the rotary-stage discrepancy you flagged.
Why we don't just adopt the staff's "150MP"
The ENERGY-7 answer (#256) says the channel-cut crystal is rocked on an ABRS-150MP. But the installed sample rotary's identity is anchored hard: a serial-numbered ABRS-250MP-M-AS (
S/N 146853-A-1-1-X, drawing630C2125), which the same staff confirmed in STAGE-3 (#164) — explicitly "corrects the ABS typo." The ABRS-150MP is a real stage, but it's the documented swap-kit alternate (item_050: 250MP installed + 150MP + an ABS2000 spindle), not the one in beam.So "150MP" is either a slip for the installed 250MP, or evidence that the 150MP is genuinely mounted for energy-cal — which is a kit swap, and that's exactly the open STAGE-5 question. You don't repaint a serial-numbered asset's model on a one-line side-mention.
What this does
Pure docs;
mkdocs --strictclean.🤖 Generated with Claude Code