Skip to content

πŸ§ͺ Add tests for extract_content in secret_scanner.py#1

Open
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
improve-testing-secret-scanner-7057320559286808141
Open

πŸ§ͺ Add tests for extract_content in secret_scanner.py#1
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
improve-testing-secret-scanner-7057320559286808141

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎯 What: Testing gap addressed for the extract_content function in hooks/secret_scanner.py. The function was lacking automated tests.
πŸ“Š Coverage: Scenarios for Write tool (with and without "content" key), Edit tool (with and without "new_string" key), and unhandled tool types (returning empty string) are now tested.
✨ Result: 100% test coverage for the extract_content function, improving reliability and confidence for future refactoring.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 7057320559286808141 started by @zknpr

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants