Skip to content

πŸ§ͺ Add test coverage for secret scanner hook#9

Open
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
testing-secret-scanner-16514947616525273861
Open

πŸ§ͺ Add test coverage for secret scanner hook#9
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
testing-secret-scanner-16514947616525273861

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎯 What: Adds comprehensive test coverage for hooks/secret_scanner.py to test secret detection logic.
πŸ“Š Coverage: Tests is_env_file, extract_content, and multiple positive/negative scenarios for scan_content (including rules like eth_private_key, mnemonic_phrase, aws_key, api_key_assignment, and jwt_token).
✨ Result: Provides a robust safety net to ensure no regressions are introduced into the secret scanning hook logic when future refactoring occurs.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16514947616525273861 started by @zknpr

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants